Monday, February 8, 2010

It's Not about Gene Robinson

In the weeks and months that followed my formal letting go of being ordained ("renunciation of the ordained ministry" is the official term for it in the Episcopal Church), I began to notice a clear pattern emerging in people's responses to the news. People who didn't know me all that well but who knew about the on-going brou-ha-ha in the Episcopal Church around the ordination of gay clergy and the blessing and marrying of same sex couples often assumed my departure was about that. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

One source of dismay for me is even knowing that a sizable portion of Episcopal clergy who have chosen to renounce their ordinations falls into that camp--leaving the Episcopal Church in protest over the ordination of Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire, the first openly gay priest to be elected  and consecrated as bishop (there have been "closeted" gay priests and bishops for aeons). Some have left in order to join the Roman Catholic Church or some other safe haven for "traditional interpretations" of Scripture, at least as far as homosexuality is concerned. Some have perhaps left because they've grown too soul-weary or  have been badly burned by resistance to their efforts in support of gay rights in the church.

In any case, there was a stretch of time when I seemed to be hearing those responses so much that I wished (and even imagined) I were wearing a sign that read: "It's Not About Gene Robinson"! Now that I think of it, it amazes me that I heard that so often, because I wasn't exactly spending oodles of time around churches and church people in 2008. (Ah, my memory is clearing--I also heard that quite a bit, after David and I had departed from parish ministry in 2006. I've done a bit of clumping of memories.)

In late spring of 2008 I had the deep satisfaction of being able to speak about this publicly in the presence of Gene Robinson himself when he was speaking at Portland High School to Maine students, teachers, and supporters of GLSEN, the Gay Straight Lesbian Education Network. After his animated talk and questions from students, a slew of local clergy and religious leaders were invited to stand and introduce themselves and be on hand as resource people to the high schoolers. I had been invited by someone who didn't realize I'd recently renounced my ordination and who, when she learned of it, thought that a former clergy person simply added another religious story and more variety to the mix.

There in the presence of Gene Robinson and about a hundred others, I described my recent action renouncing my ordination and said: "It is a source of sadness and frustration for me that many people assume my decision was in some way about Gene Robinson, and I am truly delighted to be able to say in Gene's presence that that is not the case. My decision was a matter of believing that in order for me to be freely and fully myself, more fully alive and happy, that I needed to let my ordination go."

When I told the group that I sometimes wished I were wearing a sign saying, "It's not about Gene Robinson", Bishop Robinson chimed in: "I wish you were too!"

4 comments:

Karl Maria said...

It's interesting to me that there is always the question "Why did you do it?"... I have run into that myself in a variety of situations, when I've chosen to do something new or not do something I've always done, or to follow a path that isn't as visible out looking in.

I have answers sometimes, but other times, I admit, I'm struggling myself to understand the whys. It's more about living into our decisions, and seeing them as testing grounds for our intentional lives, than it is about living a life that will be judged consistent. The judging part of us, our friends, our families, wants to understand... but behind that want is a multiplicity of desires, some healthy, some not.

OK, maybe I'm rambling a bit!

Meredith said...

Adding my thoughts to this discourse, sometimes people just become so tunnel-visioned that they don't see the many choices all of us are given to change our life course, take another tack, visit a part of the Self that hasn't yet become an acquaintance. They just plod along, often happily enough, living their everyday lives unaware of the many facets of their own souls that long to be explored. You took a big and brave leap of faith, Sukie, and maybe (although this wasn't and still isn't your objective) you just might serve as a role model for those who also long to make such a leap, and haven't yet.

In the questions posed to you, I hear others asking, "Why did you disturb that status quo? I'm curious." and, in that, looking for reasons they might dare to follow you into unknown regions of the heart and soul!

Sukie Curtis said...

Great thoughts, both of you! Making this a richer exploration. I like Karl's "living into our decisions and seeing them as testing grounds for our intentional lives".

And Meredith's reminder of the "many choices all of us are given to change our life course, take another tack, visit a part of the Self that hasn't yet become an acquaintance."

Yes, yes!! Thanks for your comments.

Joao said...

Hello, nice blog!
See my site: www.freetomar.com
Bye!